Visions of Work in Feminist Theory

Main Article Content

Susan Ferguson

Abstract

This article takes a look at the various ways in which labor has been assessed in feminist theory, within which two broad analytic approaches can be discerned. They both identify the societal devaluing of and restrictions on the work women do as defining features of women’s inequality and oppression, but they differ in their conceptualizations of social power and, relatedly, in their political projects for women’s emancipation. The first one, “equality feminism”, focuses on the sexual division of labor, whereas the second one, “social reproduction feminism”, focuses on reproductive labor as a key element in the ongoing reproduction of capitalist society. The article analyses both perspectives and argues that the second approach succeeds in overcoming the weaknesses of the first.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ferguson, S. (2020). Visions of Work in Feminist Theory. Archivos De Historia Del Movimiento Obrero Y La Izquierda, (16), 17-36. https://doi.org/10.46688/ahmoi.n16.242
Section
Special Theme: The Work of Women: Feminism, Marxism and Social Reproduction

References

Banaji, J. (2003). The Fictions of Free Labour: Contract, Coercion and So-called Unfree Labour. Historical Materialism, 11 (3), 69–95.

Benston, M. (1969). The Political Economy of Women’s Liberation. Monthly Review, 21 (4), 13–27.

Bezanson, K. y Luxton, M. (2006). Introduction: Social Reproduction and Feminist Political Economy. En K. Bezanson y M. Luxton (eds.), Social Reproduction: Feminist Political Economy Challenges Neo-Liberalism (pp. 3-11). McGill-Queen’s UP.

Brown Blackwell, A. (1975). Relation of Women’s Work in the Household to Work Outside. En A.S. Kraditor, Up from the Pedestal: Selected Writings in the History of American Feminism (pp. 159-159). Quadrangle Books.

Burnham, L. (2013) 1% Feminism. Open Democracy, 13 de abril. https://www.opendemocracy.net/5050/linda-burnham/1-feminism. Consultado el 1 de agosto de 2017.

Clark, A. (1992). Working Life of Women in the Seventeenth Century. Routledge [1919].

Clinton, H. (2016). “To Every Little Girl Who Dreams Big: Yes, You Can Be Anything You Want. Even President. Tonight Is for You. H.” Twitter, 7 de junio, 6:08 p.m. https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/740349871073398785.

Dalla Costa, M. y Jones, S. (1973). The Power of Women and the Subversion of the Community. Falling Wall Press.

Davis, A. (1982). Women, Race and Class. Women’s Press.

De Gouges, O (2017). Declaration of the Rights of Women and Citizens [1791]. [Trad. esp.: O. De Gouges et al. (2007), Cuatro mujeres en la Revolución Francesa. Biblos]

Engels, F. (1972). The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State. International [1884].

Federici, S. (2004). Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation. Autonomedia.

Ferguson, S. (2016). Intersectionality and Social-Reproduction Feminisms: Toward an Integrative Theory. Historical Materialism, 24 (2), 38–60.

Ferguson, S. y McNally, D. (2014). Precarious Migrants: Gender, Race and the Social Reproduction of a Global Working Class. En L. Panitch y G. Albo (eds.). Socialist Register 2015: Transforming Classes (pp. 1-23). Merlin Press.

Goodman, R. T. (2013). Gender Work: Feminism after Neoliberalism. Palgrave Macmillan.

Hartmann, H. (1979). The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More Progressive Union. Capital & Class, 3 (2), 1-33.

Hayden, D. (1982). The Grand Domestic Revolution: A History of Feminist Designs for American Homes, Neighborhoods, and Cities. MIT Press.

Hennessy, R. (2013). Fires on the Border: The Passionate Politics of Labor Organizing on the Mexican Frontera. University of Minnesota Press.

Jones, C. (1949). An End to the Neglect of the Problems of the Negro Woman! Political Affairs. National Women’s Commission, CPUSA. University of California Digital Library, junio, p. 5. http://purl.flvc.org/FCLA/DT/1927554. Consultado el 1 de agosto de 2017.

Katsarova, R. (2015). Repression and Resistance on the Terrain of Social Reproduction: Historical Trajectories, Contemporary Openings. Viewpoint Magazine, 5, 31 de octubre. https://www.viewpointmag.com/2015/10/31/repression-and-resistance-on-the-terrain-of-social-reproduction-historical-trajectories-contemporary-openings/. Consultado el 1 de agosto de 2017.

LeBaron, G. (2014). Unfree Labor beyond Binaries: Social Hierarchy, Insecurity, and Labor Market Restructuring. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 17 (1), 1–19.

Mezzadri, A. (2017). The Sweatshop Regime: Labouring Bodies, Exploitation, and Garments Made in India. Cambridge University Press.

Mies, M. (1998). Patriarchy & Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labour. Zed Books.

Miles, A. (1993). Margaret Benston’s Political Economy of Women’s Liberation: International Impact. Canadian Women’s Studies/Les cahiers de la femme, 13(2), 31-35.

Mohanty, C.T. (1984). Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Difference. Boundary, 2 (12-13), 333–358.

Molyneux, M. (1979). Beyond the Domestic Labor Debate. New Left Review, 116, 3-27.

Nadasen, P. (2005). Welfare Warriors: The Welfare Rights Movement in the United States. Routledge.

National Organization for Women (1966). http://now.org/about/history/statement-of-purpose/. Consultado el 1 de agosto de 2017.

Perkins Gillman, C. (1975). Economic Basis of the Woman Question. En A.S. Kraditor (ed.) Up from the Pedestal: Selected Writings in the History of American Feminism (pp. 175-178). Quadrangle Books [1898].

Picchio, A. (1992). Social Reproduction: The Political Economy of the Labour Market. Cambridge University Press.

Pinchbeck, I. (1985). Women Workers and the Industrial Revolution 1750–1850. Virago Press [1930].

Radcliffe, M.A. (1799). The Female Advocate: Or an Attempt to Recover the Rights of Women from Male Usurpation. Vernor and Hood. http://ota.ox.ac.uk/text/5092.html. Consultado el 1 de agosto de 2017.

Rankin, K.N. (2001). Governing Development: Neoliberalism, Microcredit, and Rational Economic Woman. Economy and Society, 30 (1), 18–37.

Rathgeber, E. M. (1990). WID, WAD, GAD: Trends in Research and Practice. The Journal of Developing Areas, 24 (4), 289–302.

Reeves, H. y Baden, S. (2000). Gender and Development: Concepts and Definitions. Institute of Development Studies.

Seccombe, W. (1993). Weathering the Storm: Working-Class Families from the Industrial Revolution to the Fertility Decline. Verso Books.

Siegel, R. B. (1993-1994). Home as Work: The First Women’s Rights Claims Concerning Wives’ Household Labor, 1850-1880. Yale Law Journal, 103, 1073–1217.

Stern, E. (1975). Women Are Household Slaves. En A.S. Kraditor, Up from the Pedestal: Selected Writings in the History of American Feminism (pp. 346-353). Quadrangle Books.

Thompson, W. (1825). Appeal of One Half the Human Race, Women, Against the Pretensions of the Other Half, Men, to Retain Them in Political, and Thence in Civil and Domestic Slavery. Longman, Hurst Rees, Orme, Brown & Green.

Weeks, K. (2011). The Problem with Work: Feminism, Marxism, Antiwork Politics, and Postwork Imaginaries. Duke UP.

Wollstonecraft, M. (1999). Vindication of the Rights of Women [1792]. Bartleby. http://www.bartleby.com/144/. Consultado el 1 de agosto de 2017.

Wright, M. (2006). Disposable Women and Other Myths of Global Capitalism. Routledge.